Law Technology News
December 1999
AMERICAN LAWYER MEDIA NATIONAL SITES

National Sites

The American Lawyer Magazine

Corporate Counsel

National Law Journal

Law Catalog

Legal Seminars

LAW NEWS NETWORK

Practice Central

Open Court

Discussion

Law Jobs

Law Firm Central

REGIONAL SITES

New York

New Jersey

Connecticut

Pennsylvania

Delaware

Washington, D.C.

Georgia

Florida

Texas

California

Illinois

Letters to the Editor

What About Us?

Re: Web Watch by Robert J. Ambrogi, "Software Programs that Skip the

Software," Nov. 1999.

Editor:

Robert Ambrogi overlooked a superior Web-based time tracking and invoicing product, "Gorilla Time." (See page 39, of the same issue). Although my view may be biased, when compared on both price and performance, Gorilla Time comes out ahead of the competition -- way ahead.

Red Gorilla's Gorilla Time is accessible everywhere, by Web-browser, Palm and cell phone. Cell phone access is a key differentiator. Data entered via cell phone is imported instantaneously, in real time. When you track time on the go (during your commute, waiting for your latte at Starbucks etc.), you improve accuracy, avoiding the tendency to "leave time on the table."

Gorilla Time is truly free, and scalable at no extra cost. We grow as companies grow. By the time a company using TimeBills reaches 10 employees, they'll find themselves paying several hundred dollars for the most basic service. Add to that the cost of multiple invoices and all-of-a-sudden, the price goes through the roof.

Finally, as Ambrogi points out, tracking time is just the first step for law firms. Clients want to see aggregated information in a variety of formats, necessitating a sophisticated reporting process. Gorilla Time offers almost 20 custom reports.

John Witchel
Chief Executive Officer
Red Gorilla
San Francisco

* * * *

No Juris?

Re: Second Opinions, by Alan Pearlman and John L. Mellitz, November, 1999.

Editor:

How could you leave Juris out of your listing? It's wonderful and the support is terrific.

Donna Penn
Bell, Orr, Ayers & Moore, PSC
Bowling Green, Kentucky.

* * * *

Alan Pearlman responds:

I heartily agree Juris is a very fine product, however, it is also a very expensive product. From that viewpoint, Juris, while wonderful, can and would be quite cost prohibitive for a small firm.

John Mellitz responds:

Juris and ProLaw are both excellent systems, but would be total overkill for the firm in question. It makes absolutely no sense to invest $10,000 in software to do what can be done with $3,000 systems.

Nevertheless, I would be interested in your "take" on the subject, and the reasons you would recommend Juris over the products mentioned in the article. (Service and support are very important, but I cannot imagine any that is significantly better than that provided by the TABS III people. The other products are some time, but not always, problematic in this area).

Inside
Letter from the Editor

Tech Calendar

The Year in Review

Reader's Interest Awards

Letters to the Editor



Emerging Technologies

Law Tech News

mis@The San Francisco Public Defender's Office

Second Opinions

Small & Home Office

Web Works

Systems Management

Web Watch



Cameras & Accessories

Utilities Roundup

Time & Billing

Speech Recognition

Quick Takes

Practice Tools

Portable Office

Office Gear

Networking & Storage

Mail Box

Litigation Showcase

Library Administration

Industry News



November 1999 Issue
© 1999 Law Technology News